Q&A: What books should a new western traditonal Gaudiya Vaishnava read?

Q: Can someone tell me which translations that are in English of Bhagavad Gita, Srimad Bhagavatam and Chaitanya Charitamrta does a traditional Gaudiya Vaishnava use? I realize that many disciples of Ananta das Babaji came from Iskcon and so still have the translations of BVSP to use, but what translations would be recommended for the brand new generation of GV's? Also, what is actually the recommendation of which books to read? Is it these three mentioned and in addition a book similar to Bhaktirasamrta Sindhu, or some other book that outlines the preliminary stages to the devotional path?

A: There is still a long way to go until we have carefully translated, definitive translations of all the core Gaudiya Vaishnava texts. The current selection of translations on the market often calls for a number of footnotes on the credits and shortcomings of the works to go along with the recommendation.

Below is a list of titles I consider essential reading for a Gaudiya Vaishnava, who wishes to be well acquainted with the theological foundations of his tradition – alphabetically listed. Notes on currently available editions, whether partial or complete, have been included.

Bhagavad-gita with Vishwanath Chakravarti’s and Baladeva Vidyabhushan’s commentaries – A classic text outlining the philosophical foundations of all Vaishnava-traditions.

Availability: Bhanu Swami has recently published an edition of Vishwanath Chakravarti’s commentary. BV Narayana Maharaja has published an edition with Vishwanath Chakravati’s and Bhaktivinoda Thakur’s commentaries. Of the two, the latter includes anvaya (“word-for-word”), as does A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami’s, whose well-known edition includes a commentary of his own, using Baladeva’s tika as the foundation. Aside this, there are many contemporary commentaries.

Rupa Goswami’s Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu with the commentaries of Jiva Goswami and Viswanath Chakravarti – The definitive work on devotion in practice and the nature of the perfection sought for.

Availability: David Habermann has published a complete edition in cooperation with Srivatsa Goswami of Chaitanya Prema Samsthan. Some notes from the commentaries have been included. B.V. Narayana Maharaja has published an edition of Vishwanath Chakravarti’s Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu-bindu, a summary of Rupa’s work, which is also very useful.

Jiva Goswami’s Bhakti-sandarbha – A thorough and systematic delineation of the theology of devotion in practice.

Availability: Kusakratha Das has presented a complete translation of the text. Satya Narayana Das of Jiva Institute has recently published the first volume (of three) of the text, including Devanagari-text, transliteration and translation, making a vast improvement over Kusakratha’s edition that is regrettably not a very accurate representation of the original.

Sanatana Goswami’s Brihad-bhagavatamrita with his own commentary, an exploration of bhakti-siddhanta in the form of a narrative, supplemented with Rupa Goswami’s Laghu-bhagavatamrita, a concice thesis of the above.

Availability: Gopiparanadhana Das and BBT have presented a fine edition of the text in three volumes, including a translation of most of the tika, re-worded for smoother reading. Other translations, without a commentary, float around as e-texts. Kusakratha Das has published an edition of Laghu-bhagavatamrita that is being re-published.

Vrindavan Das Thakur’s Chaitanya Bhagavata – A voluminous biography narrating Sri Chaitanya’s years in Navadvipa.

Availability: Bhumipati Das and Pundarika Vidyanidhi Das are publishing a multi-volume edition of the work with the original text and Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati’s commentary. Sarvabhavana Das has published a one-volume edition. BV Puri Maharaja has published an edition that appears to be a polished version of an early draft of Sarvabhavana’s work.

Krishnadas Kaviraja’s Chaitanya Caritamrita – A wonderful blend of biographical narrative and philosophy, focusing on Sri Chaitanya’s later years.

Availability: Edward Dimock has published an edition of Chaitanya Caritamrita with aid from Radha Govindanath’s famous commentary in his translation. A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami has published an edition with his own commentaries, drawing from Bhaktivinoda’s and Bhaktisiddhanta’s. Unlike Dimock’s, his multi-volume edition includes both the original Bengali text as well as synonyms. Dimock’s edition appears to be a more literal representation of the original.

Dhyanachandra Goswami’s Gaura-govindarchana-smarana-paddhati – An outline of the specific practices a sadhaka is to undertake in the course of his day-to-day bhajan.

Availability: Haricarana Das has translated the work. It was once available as an e-text, and is currently being re-edited and published in cooperation with the Blazing Sapphire Press.

Krishnadas Kaviraja’s Govinda-lilamrita – A voluminous narration describing the eight-fold daily pastimes of Radha and Krishna.

Availability: Advaitadas has published an edition with Rasbihari Lal & Sons. While the language of the translation could flow better, it is a fair representation of the original. Gadadhara Prana Das has also published an edition, and while his language certainly flows colorful, it would benefit from splitting elaborations into footnotes.

Gopala Bhatta Goswami’s Hari-bhakti-vilasa with Sanatana Goswami’s commentary – On matters of sadachar and rules for worship.

Availability: Rasbihari Lal & Sons are currently publishing a five-volume edition of the work with the first two volumes (ch. 1-10) currently available. While certainly helpful, the works could benefit from a translator who would translate directly from Sanskrit. Bhrigumuni Das has published a work called “Dearest to Vishnu”, a faithful presentation of chapters 12-16 dealing with Ekadashi.

Vishwanath Chakravarti’s Madhurya Kadambini – A comprehensive work outlining the course of a sadhaka’s progress towards the perfection.

Availability: Sri Krishna Chaitanya Shastra Mandir has published an edition including the original Sanskrit text and Ananta Das Babaji Maharaja’s elaborate commentary. Sarvabhavana Das and Dina Bandhu Das have both published translations of the text.

Narottama Das Thakur’s Prema-bhakti-chandrika – A beautiful outline of all that’s essential on the path of bhakti.

Availability: Sri Krishna Chaitanya Shastra Mandir has published an edition including Ananta Das Babaji Maharaja’s elaborate commentary, the English edition is currently available in manuscript form. Isvara Das has published an edition that could benefit from more accuracy. The included Bengali script is riddled with mistakes.

Srimad Bhagavatam with Sanatana Goswami’s, Jiva Goswami’s and Vishwanath Chakravarti’s commentaries – The vast garden in which the seed of our tradition of bhakti-rasa was planted.

Availability: A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami has published translations of cantos 1-10/1 with the original Sanskrit text, transliteration and synonyms. His followers have published cantos 10/2-12 in the same style, often including translations of passages from earlier tikas in their commentary. Gita Press has published a complete translation of the text, which is, a few blunders aside, generally fine. Bhanu Swami has recently translated Vishwanath Chakravarti’s commentaries on the 10th canto.

Rupa Goswami’s Upadeshamrita from Stava-mala – A concise, yet essential work offering instructions to a sadhaka who seeks progress in his practices.

Availability: BV Narayana Maharaja has presented a translation of the work with three commentaries, by Radha Ramana Das Goswami, Bhaktivinoda Thakur and Bhaktisiddhanta Sarasvati. While the translations at times drift a bit aside from the original, the edition is useful.

Rupa Goswami’s Ujjvala-nilamani– The post-graduate study of Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu, an extensive study of the nuances of madhura-bhakti-rasa.

Availability: Puri Maharaj of Gaudiya Math has published an edition which is far from being definitive, but helpful nonetheless. BV Narayana Maharaja is rumored to be preparing an elaborate edition with a commentary.

Raghunath Das Goswami’s Vilapa-kusumanjali– The zenith of aspirations on the path of raga, a heart crying out for Sri Radha’s service.

Availability: Ananta Das Babaji Maharaja has published an edition with elaborate commentaries, currently available in manuscript form. Availability is generally restricted, on the author’s request, to initiated traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavas.

Additionally, there is a rich tradition of Pada-kavya in our tradition – thousands and thousands of poems have been written over the centuries by early and modern pada-kavis alike, compositions that are instrumental in entering the world of bhakti-rasa.

Availability: BBT has published a song-book called Songs of Vaishnava Acharyas, Dasarath Suta Das has published a song-book called More Songs of Vaishnava Acharyas. BV Narayana Maharaja has published a song-book called Gaudiya Giti Guccha. Countless individual padas have been translated and are available online.

There are dozens of other titles that could justifiably be included in this list, such as select short works from Rupa Goswami's Stava-mala and Raghunath Das Goswami's Stavavali, or from among Baladeva's voluminous works.

To ensure that there is no room for misunderstandings or misinterpretations, consultation with devotees familiar with the works is recommended, and basic knowledge of Bengali and Sanskrit languages is very helpful. The Gaudiya Grantha Mandira offers a large repository of Sanskrit texts that may be used to supplement editions without the original text included.

* * * * * * *

Q: But I notice that a good number of the works you mentioned are works done by and commented by IGM figures, such as the referral you gave for Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam. In some cases, I guess not only the commentaries, but also the verse translation may not be considered accurate by a Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnava. In the case of the various bonafide siddha pranali lines, do they use translations of these texts that are made by people in their own lineage, but are in Hindi or Bengali? In that case, it shouldn't be too hard for an English translation to come fairly soon.

A: The Gaudiya tradition is very cross-lineage in its approach as far as general themes such as these are concerned. I haven't heard anyone expressing concerns over reading translations from those outside one's own parampara. In fact, it is quite common that one may have an instructing guru from a different lineage - this was the case with my Param-guru, whose first siksha-guru, Sri Krishna Chaitanya Das Babaji, was from Shyamananda-parivar, and whose vesh-guru, Pandit Advaita Das Babaji, was of Advaita-parivar. The stress on diksha-parampara must not be taken out of proportion and context.

Yes - accuracy is a great concern with many, if not most, translations currently available on the market. So much so that I personally refuse to accept any scriptural references as evidence unless accompanied by the original text. How many times have I come across "evidence" that was practically unrecognizable as a translation of the original!

Practically all important Gaudiya Vaishnava texts have been translated to Bengali, most are available in Hindi as well. Goofs in translations, however, are not the privilege of ISKCON and Gaudiya Math publications - as long as one does not familiarize himself with the original language of the text, one will have to live with a degree of uncertainty over the exact and precise meaning of the text.

To accurately translate Sanskrit-texts, I do not consider a mere translation from a Hindi or Bengali translation to be adequate. The translation must be verified against the original Sanskrit, so much can change in translations of translations. The original translator may have found some passages hard to understand, or may have felt a need to explain something more elaborately than the original for ease of reading. The translator of translation, then, will in his turn do the same - how far will the text evolve from the original?

Many works published from ISKCON and Gaudiya Math contain translations or commentaries that we would not consider accurate or tasteful. Regardless, they are helpful, and have therefore been mentioned. I rarely read contemporary commentaries from IGM-sources, aside occasional peeks as a matter of curiosity, or if the work contains a substantial amount of references from earlier sources.

It is a fact that these works should all be soon translated into English, and indeed wiht some volunteer effort, it could easily be accomplished. Sadly, few have come forward to offer their services, even if in return for limited financial compensation. Our society in the West is still in a budding state, and resources for abundant financing of such projects just aren't there.

Q&A: Discussing one's bhajan with others

Q: Is it all right to discuss one's bhajan with others? Perhaps one may have an exceptional dream or a realization during bhajan – to whom may one speak of it, and to whom not?

A: We sometimes come across Vaisnavas who are fond of liberally sharing of their experiences, gained in dreams and in wakefulness all the same. However, visions and dreams with special spiritual significance are private matters one should cherish within the chamber of the heart. By airing them out in the public, their impact on the self fades and vanishes over time.

As recommended in Hari-bhakti-vilasa:

svapne vAkSi-samakSaM vA Azcaryam atiharSadam /
akasmAd yadi jAyeta na khyAtavyaM guror vinA //2.143//

"In dreams, or before one's eyes, if an astonishing, thrilling event suddenly occurs, it is not to be told of to others aside the guru."

If there are senior Vaisnavas in whom we have deep faith, and whom we regard essentially in the capacity of a guru, dreams and other special events may be disclosed to them as well.

However, only one who has digested and well internalized the experience may share it with others. Even then, they are to be shared with the faithful alone – with those who will respect and find deep inspiration in the same. Revealing heart's matters before the faithless is wholly improper. If this warning is not paid heed to, we gradually lose the impact of the experience, and additionally risk becoming subject to pride and a host of other vice arising from an inflated sense of self-importance and the possible admiration of others.

Again, in the words of Narottama Das Thakur Mahasaya from his Prema-bhakti-candrika:

Apana bhajana kathA, na kahiba yathA tathA, ihAte haiba sAvadhAna /

"The topics of your own bhajana, speak not of them here and there. In this, I shall exercise caution."

Then, he notes: rAkha prema hRdaya bhariyA – "Protect your love, burying it within your heart!" He says, gupate sAdhibe siddhi – "Perfection is attained in secrecy." The intimacy of experiences with God is likened to the lovers' relationship in an apt metaphor found in Hatha-yoga-pradipika (3.9):

gopanIyaM prayatnena yathA ratna-karaNDakam /
kasyacin naiva vaktavyaM kula-strI-surataM yathA //

"Hide them with persevering effort,
as you would a basket of jewels –
Truly don't speak of them to anyone,
As a noble lady wouldn't speak of making love."

Therefore, accomplished Vaisnavas never share of their experiences in bhajana in public. The absence of replies does not make a commentary on the presence or absence of experiences as such. Often, it only tells of the wisdom of silence. Those who have something factually precious to share will carefully guard it as a hidden treasure. Access to such treasures is gained through gaining the Vaisnava's confidence, for such things are not to be squandered in broadcasting to a mixed audience, as one would not hurl bucketfuls of pearls before the swine.

Again, in the words of Sri Jiva from his Bhakti-sandarbha (339):

atra ca zrI guroH zrI bhagavato vA prasAda labdhaM sAdhana sAdhyagataM svIya sarvasva bhUtaM yat kim api rahasyaM tat tu na kasmaicit prakAzanIyam yathAha:

"Then, the secrets of one's own that are obtained with practice and in attaining perfection – with the grace of Sri Guru and Sri Bhagavan – are never to be disclosed to anyone. As in the Bhagavata:

naitat parasmA AkhyeyaM pRSThayApi kathaJcana /
sarvaM sampadyate devi deva guhyaM susaMvRtam // BhP 8.17.20

"This is not to be disclosed to outsiders, even if inquired on by someone;
All the secrets of the gods, O Devi, will yield their fruit when well concealed."

The warnings aside now, observe the merits of containing the experience – at the opening of Rupa's Utkalika-vallari, one of his final works:

prapadya vRndAvana-madhyam ekaH
krozann asAv utkalikAkulAtmA /
udghATayAmi jvalataH kaThorAM
bASpasya mudrAM hRdi mudritasya //1//

"Cast down amidst Vrindavana is one
In tears with the longings of an agitated heart
I shall reveal the fierce burning
The marks of tears imprinted in the heart."

The word bASpa means tears, and it means steam as well. Countless tears have left their deep wounds in Rupa's heart. The outburst of seventy verses of intense emotion are the result of decades of withholding an immeasurable depth of feelings. Read the description of Bhakti-ratnakara:

eka dina rAdhA-kRSNa viccheda kathate /
kANDaye vaiSNava mUrccha-gata pRthivite //
agni-zikhA prAya jvale rUpera hRdaYa /
tathApi bAhire kichu prakAza nA haYA //
karu dehe zrI-rUpera niHzvAsa sparzila /
agni-zikhA prAYa sei dehe braNa haila //
dekhiYA sabAra mane haila camatkAra /
aiche zrI-rUpera kriyA kahite ki Ara //

"One day, the separation of Radha and Krishna was discussed;
The Vaisnavas cried, falling senseless on the ground.
Rupa's heart was ablaze like the tip of a flame,
And yet outside nothing was manifest at all.
Whose body Sri Rupa's exhalation would touch,
That body would be burnt, as if touched by a flame.
Seeing this, astonishment filled all –
Such are Sri Rupa's deeds, what more can one say?"

This is the power of conserving emotion and experience within. This is the power of devotion contained. Do not build up your bhajana only to waste it away, let it not be blown with the wind to a thousand directions.

* * * * * * *

Q: What kinds of experiences can be revealed, and what ought to be kept hidden?

A: There are experiences that are very particular, and the revealing of which would set one apart from others and draw particular attention to oneself. Such experiences should be kept carefully under a lid, even among an assembly of devotees.

For example – you have had a dream where Thakur has given you a beautiful darshan or an advice, or you have had a vision at the time of illness that has cured you, or a strong experience has cast you into an ocean of anubhava and sattvika-bhava – things like this you should keep carefully hidden.

The experience you note is a beautiful experience, but it is a general experience, and something that can be easily shared by many. In fact, if someone is not moved to tears after reading of the acts and character of saints like this, there is something very wrong. Even a worldly person would feel moved at the sight of such sincerity.

Still, something such as what you mention should not be spoken to non-devotees, but in an assembly of devotees it is fine. I have been particularly protective of the sanctity of this forum's atmosphere especially for the aim of our being able to speak and have exchanges more freely than we could have had at places like Gaudiya Discussions with a completely mixed member base. This is why we also have members only sections and a public section here. I can't recall to which you posted the passage you cite, but it didn't strike me as inappropriate; rather I was very pleased to read it, and it no doubt serves as inspiration for others, too, to read and hear such narrations.

There are fine lines, and the lines are subjective to a great many factors that make up what you are, contributing to your eligibility to do diverse things. Your own borders are only found through experience and reflection.

Q&A: Siddha-identity in everyday life: Harmonizing siddha-deha with ordinary activities

Q: I have been wondering how one harmonizes one's siddha-identity with "ordinary" activities like bathing, eating, going to the toilet etc. Or is that a kind of mental switch, like during bhajan I am X gopi (siddha-deha), then I turn into Y das (sadhaka-deha) and do my ordinary activities until its bhajan time again? How can I meditate upon myself as a perfected, spiritual entity while being sick, driving a car, using my mobile phone or arguing with the boss in the office etc.?

A:  In his Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu, Sripad Rupa Goswamipad presents the famous two-fold division of seva to be undertaken by those who seek to follow the raga-marga:

sevA sAdhaka-rUpeNa siddha-rUpeNa cAtra hi |
tad-bhAva-lipsunA kAryA vraja-lokAnusArataH || brs 1.2.295

"Serving in the sadhaka-form, as well as in the siddha-form, engaged in activities while desiring the mood of the residents of Vraja, following in their wake."

The external sadhaka-life is to be undertaken while emulating the example of the Goswamis of Vrindavan, engaged in the varieties of devotional services led by sravana, kirtana, archana and so forth. These activities are classified as svAbhISTa-bhAva-sambandhi, or as having a direct relationship with one's desired feelings. These activities, even though undertaken in the external body, lead one to the identity within. Therefore, there is no essential conflict between the two realms in which service has been undertaken.

Such activities of devotional service are also known as svarUpa-siddha-bhakti, or acts that are inherently devotional by their nature. This classification has been presented in contrast to saGga-siddha-bhakti, or elements that attain the quality of devotion through contact with devotion, and aropa-siddha-bhakti, or activities over which the quality of devotion is superimposed, and that are therefore considered to be akin to bhakti.

The quality for kindling inner revelation that is inherent in activities of svarUpa-siddha-bhakti lacks in the two other categories. Activities such as maintaining one's livelihood through work in the society, and thereby maintaining one's facility for devotional services, are generally known as aropa-siddha-bhakti, or activities that become devotional through superimposition. The activities are not devotional in and of themselves, their quality is transformed after the event through the devotee's internal spirit of offering and surrender.

Though elements of aropa-siddha-bhakti are also helpful, and indeed a necessity at a certain stage, they must begin to withdraw as one enters into the world of siddha-rUpa-sevA. Lacking a direct connection with the transcendent realm in which the seva is to take place, they have a great potential for distracting the mind. Some elevated souls are able to transmutate even worldly activities into direct acts of devotion through the power of their smarana, remaining aloof from external influence. However, most sadhakas will find that such external activities will prove to be obstacles in the practice of smarana.

Some aspects of ordinary daily life have qualities that are parallel to the course of the lila. Therefore, someone conversant with the lila can easily attribute the self-conception of the svarupa and the flow of the lila over them and remain in the proper self-identity in the course of the said activities. One should, as far as possible, seek to organize his life in a manner that facilitiates absorption in the lila throughout the day.

The adoption of a specific transcendent identity and the subsequent gradual absorption in the nectarine services of Radha-Krishna possess a vast potential for attracting and containing the consciousness beyond and away from this world. Therefore, as one becomes more accomplished in such practices, he will find it harder and harder to dwell amidst a mundane environment, so much so that time spent in distraction will begin to be felt as painful, and indeed unbearable. The two worlds don't mix together all that well.

For success in smarana, it is vital that one protect the consciousness from outer influences, as smarana is dependent on the purity of the mind – smaraNaM tu zuddhAntaH-karaNatAm apekSate (BhS 276). The foremost among the purifiers of the heart is the chanting of the divine Name, which one should chant at least one lakh, or sixty-four rounds, daily. Before exposing the matter of raga-bhajana (verse 8) in his Upadeshamrita, Srila Rupa Goswamipad has laid emphasis on the worship of the Name as the healer of the polluted heart (verse 7). Chanting a lakh of Names or more, along with the other devotional duties that must be undertaken to support the inner worship, take a substantial amount of time.

All of this has led some mahatmas to conclude that one should renounce the world as a prerequisite for the practice of lila-smarana. While the formal acceptance of the life of a renunciate is not necessarily called for, a withdrawal from the world is instrumental in making the practice successful. Successful smarana calls for exclusivity, and it calls for the absolute rejection of mundane desire. A heart riddled by the mundane, devoid of suddha-bhakti, is not eligible for entrance into the kingdom of rasa.

One must remember that svarupa-meditation and lila-smarana are not a matter of mere techniques of visualization. The lila is self-manifest by nature and arises of grace, grace that is drawn towards one who forsakes all for the sake of a wholehearted devotional pursuit. The appearance of the lila in the chamber of the heart cannot be forced. It flows naturally in a pure and devoted heart, and is therefore aptly called svarasiki. The varieties of meditation, memorization and visualization that are undertaken, despite their being instrumental in supporting the attainment, do not possess the power for revealing the lila and bestowing saksat-seva.

One may also, disregarding all of the above, engage in a semblance of cultivation of svarupa-meditation and lila-smarana. While through that bhajana-siddhi will not be attained, often a favorable samskara is created, a samskara that will in due course of time lead the devotee to the shelter of realized bhajananandi-mahatmas who infuse him with the power to leave behind the mundane and embrace a life of bhajan. Prior to that, practices of smarana are reminiscent of a child's play with dolls. Feeding a doll and putting it to sleep gives a conception of what having a baby is like, and yet the experience is far removed from the labor a mother must bear in caring for a child.

Q&A: Making up for lapses in devotional practices: What to do if one has been unable to complete his daily vows?

Q: What should one do if for some reason he's been unable to complete the daily devotional vows concerning the chanting of harinama or diksha-mantras, or puja?

A: It should be understood that there is no wonder trick by the doing of which the neglect of a previous day's devotional activities could be complemented whilst hoping to attain an equal result. One's daily devotional activities are nitya-niyamas, perpetual vows. One should not seek for ways to occasionally avoid them for the sake of one's leisure and pleasure. raghunAther niyama, yena pASANer rekha! - "The vows of Raghunath were like streaks on a stone." One should strive to embrace such firmness of practice to attain success in his devotional pursuits.

It may be that on account of some unforeseen, insurmountable obstacle one's devotional practice is compromized. If that is the case, some remedial measures have been taught in the Vaishnava-smriti and heard from the mouths of the sadhus. Yet, one should not, on their strength, neglect one's devotional vows in a calculated manner, "If I don't fulfill my vows of bhajan today, then here's what I need to do tomorrow to make up for it. Let me therefore leave it for tomorrow." No! This will imbibe the flaw of nAmno balAd yasya hi pApa-buddhiH, to assume that one may misbehave on the strength of devotional worship.

One should think, "I must complete my daily nitya-niyamas. I must." Just as one wouldn't leave a child unfed and uncared for a day, one mustn't leave one's tender bhajan unnourished, and one mustn't keep his Thakur waiting. Utsaha and dhairya, enthusiasm and fortitude, are vital in the growth of bhakti (Upadeshamrita 3); without them, devotional progress is halted.

Should a lapse occur on account of excessive and unavoidable seva or some formidable obstruction, the general principle is that one should do more than the remaining balance as a matter of devotional atonement, with a sincere feeling of unworthiness as Thakur's servant. One must understand that the daily niyamas are a part of a living personal relationship with Thakur, not a matter of ritualistic, obligatory observance. They are our expression of longing, of our heart's budding love.

The 19th chapter of Hari-bhakti-vilasa (19.1038-1039) notes, in the context of worshiping the deity:

ekAha pUjAvihitau kuryAd dvi-guNam arcanam |
tri-rAtre tu mahA-pUjAM samprokSaNam ataH param ||
mAsAd Urdhvam anekAhaM pUjA yadi vihanyate |
pratiSThaiveSyate kaizcit kaizcit samprokSaNa-kramaH ||

"If worship has been forsaken for a day, one ought to worship twice. If three days have passed, one should perform great worship with the bathing ceremony. If the worship has been repeatedly neglected for the duration of a month, some hold that installation should be done anew, while others recommend the bathing ceremony and so forth."

Such worship should be done in the spirit of apology, calling out for the Lord, begging him to again receive our worship, with firm determination that such neglect will not occur again.

Manohara-bhajan-dipika, discussing what ought to be done in the event that the chanting of the names has been halted for a day, states that one must then, on the following day, perform four-fold the daily vow. For example, if one's vow has been for 50.000 names daily, one should then chant 200.000 names, discarding all unneeded activity to arrange for time for its performance. In the event that daily vow has not been neglected but has been compromised, then doing the vow two-fold is sufficient.

For those chanting the Names in excess of one lakh, the four-fold atonement is not practicable for obvious reasons. Rarely it is seen, though, that someone with a lakh's daily vow would halt his nama-bhajan altogether for a day! Regardless, if their nama-bhajan has been compromised, they should chant a substantially increased quantity in proportion to their daily vows on the following day to atone for the neglect of Nama Prabhu's daily worship.

The above also applies for the chanting of the diksha-mantras and other quantifiable practices. If the practices neglected are not of a nature that could be quantified, one should sincerely regret having neglected the said practice and thereby a precious opportunity for acts of devotional worship, praying for a new opportunity. With that, one should make arrangements to see that the situation leading to the neglect will not occur again.

Q&A: Maintaining inspiration in bhajan: Sometimes inspiration comes, and again it goes...

Q: It is often seen that people come to Vraja for pilgrimage, associate with sadhus and gain much inspiration in bhajan -- only to have it diminish and wither in a few months after returning to West! What is the reason for this, how to avoid it?

A:  There are several reasons for the diminishing of enthusiasm in bhajan. As a matter of general principle, it has to do with not exercising due caution in protecting one's bhajan. For a sadhaka, protecting one's bhajan is of the utmost essence. He should not neglect or squander his precious attainments.

In his Upadeshamrita, Srila Rupa Goswamipad has listed the following six items that cause the devastation of devotional pursuits:

atyAhAraH prayAsaz ca prajalpo niyamAgrahaH |
jana-saGgaz ca laulyaM ca SaDbhir bhaktir vinazyati || 2 ||

"Excessive eating or harnessing property, strenuous endeavors, idle talks, neglect of principles, the company of the worldly and fickleness; these six make the devotion perish."

If someone, after having spent time engrossed in bhajan, returns to his worldly life of harnessing so many items that are truly not of need for a life of bhajan, he is overwhelmed by a sense of possessive illusion that blocks the consciousness from entering the ways of bhajan. If one eats in excess or eats inappropriate food from inappropriate sources, sexual desire is provoked, the consciousness is tainted with evil and the mind becomes wicked. If one engages in idle talks, such as blasphemy, gossip or topics of sensuality, he cuts on the very root of devotion through blasphemy and gossip, cultivating taste for the mundane.

If someone neglects the execution of due devotional principles, one's daily religious vows of prayer, worship and meditation, the creeper of devotion withers in shortage of water. If one maintains mundane association either through cultivating relationships with worldly people or vicariously enjoying their ways through movies, novels and so forth, his taste for the worldly is nourished, and in proportion his interest in devotion vanishes. If the mind is fickle, running across the universe and taking interest in countless topics of sense enjoyment and intellectual interest, the focus of consciousness is scattered and led afar from bhajan.

Among the six items perfecting the practice of devotion, Rupa Goswami mentions sato vRtteH, which the commentator glosses as sadAcAra, or saintly conduct. Sadachar keeps one protected from varieties of aparAdhas and shields one from mundane influence, lack thereof leads one to unknowingly commit aparAdhas and leaves one vulnerable for the effects of the world. Therefore, one should learn and adopt appropriate sadachar, saintly conduct, to protect the tender creeper of devotion.

In his teachings to Sri Rupa, Sriman Mahaprabhu taught of the cultivation of the creeper of devotion and the need to exercise great caution (CC 2.19.154ff):

tabe yAya tad-upari goloka-vRndAvana |
kRSNa-caraNa-kalpa-vRkSe kare ArohaNa ||
tAhAG vistArita haJA phale prema-phala |
ihAG mAlI sece nitya zravaNAdi jala ||
yadi vaiSNava-aparAdha uThe hAtI mAtA |
upADe vA chiNDe, tAra zukhi’ yAya pAtA ||
tAte mAlI yatna kari’ kare AvaraNa |
aparAdha-hastIra yaiche nA haya udgama ||

"Then, it grows beyond and reaches Goloka Vrindavan, climbing to the desire tree of Sri Krishna's feet.
"Extending there, it produces the fruit of prema, as the gardener always sprinkles it with the water of hearing and the such.
"Should offence at the feet of a Vaishnava arise like a mad elephant, it'll uproot or break the creeper, making its leaves dry.
"Therefore the gardener, with great diligence, prepares a protective barrier to prevent the elephant of offence from awakening."

The observance of maryAda, or proper etiquette in dealings with Vaishnavas, coupled with due awareness of inadequacies in ingredients, places and manners of activity in worship, must therefore be assimilated and maintained if one is to maintain one's firmness in pursuing devotion.

Mahaprabhu described the undesired weeds that suck the life sap of the creeper of devotion in the following words:

niSiddhAcAra, kuTInATI, jIva-hiMsana |
lAbha, pUjA, pratiSThAdi yata upazAkhA-gaNa ||
seka-jala pAJA upazAkhA bADi yAya |
stabdha haJA mUla-zAkhA bADite nA pAya ||
prathamei upazAkhAra karaye chedana |
tabe mUla-zAkhA bADi’ yAya vRndAvana ||

"Forbidden acts, duplicity, hostility towards others, mundane gain, worship and distinction, these are the host of weeds.
"Drinking the water sprinkled, they are nourished while the growth of the main creeper becomes thwarted.
"The weeds must be discarded at the very moment of their appearance; Then, the main creeper will grow and reach Vrindavan."

One should therefore stay afar from forbidden acts such as sinful deeds or other acts deemed unbefitting in the Vaishnava scriptures, be transparent in his dealings and not lead a life of deceit, not cause undue grief and anguish to other living entities, and always beware the traps of mundane gain, worship and distinction that arise parallel with the growth of devotion.

Hence the famous words, sAdhu sAvadhAn! -- "Saints, beware!". Seek to protect your devotional accomplishments by carefully weeding out crippling elements, whilst always yearning for the company of affectionate and advanced sadachari-sadhus from whose hearts the nectar of devotion oozes in our direction, and who educate us in the ways of guarding our growth in devotion.

Q&A: Birth Tithis of the Gopis

Q: Is the celebration Lalita-sasthi related to Lalita Sakhi?

A: Lalita Sasti indeed is not very likely to be connected in any way to Lalita Sakhi. It is, rather, a festival dedicated to Lalita Devi the shakti, an aspect of goddess Durga.

The details given in Radha-Krishna-ganoddesa-dipika add up to Lalita Sakhi's birth tithi occuring on sravana sukla-ekadasi. The following are the dates for all the Asta-sakhis, month and lunar day.

Lalita: sravana sukla-ekadasi
Visakha: bhadra suklashtami
Citra: asvina sukla-trayodasi
Indurekha: bhadra sukla-pancami
Campakalata: bhadra sukla-saptami
Rangadevi: bhadra sukla-tritiya
Tungavidya: bhadra sukla-pratipad
Sudevi: bhadra sukla-tritiya

Q&A: Traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism: What does the term mean, why is it used?

Q: I've seen the concept "traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism" frequently used. What does it encompass, and why has such a term been introduced?

A: The concept "traditional Gaudiya Vaishnavism" refers to established traditions of Gaudiya Vaishnavism existing since the times of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, his companions and their direct followers. The word "tradition" indicates the handing down of doctrinal interpretations and methods of devotional practice over the generations; it speaks of the presence of a parampara, a disciplic succession, an established and well preserved heritage.

The term has been coined to distinguish the tradition we regard as orthodox from the numerous contemporary and historical movements founded by charismatic leaders, who have issued reforms, introduced novel approaches and founded movements clearly distinct from the existing heritage of the tradition.

The word "traditional" is not necessarily applicable in the sense of embracing traditional social values and so forth; of course, whenever faced with, they are treated with appropriate respect. The word emphasizes tradition in the sense of a spiritual heritage, as a heritage of teachings on the path of devotion.

Traditional Gaudiya lineages are traced back to the companions of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu via a succession of mantra diksha initiations, otherwise commonly known as the guru-pranali. It is expected that every initiated Gaudiya Vaishnava is able to present their diksha-pranali when called for.

The origins of several prominent traditions, or parivAras (lit. "family") as they are often called, are listed below.

• Sri Nityananda Prabhu, Sri Jahnava Thakurani. Virabhadra Goswami, son of Nityananda and Vasudha, and the vast Nityananda-vamsha (family dynasty). Ramachandra Goswami, the adopted son of Nityananda.
• Sri Advaita Prabhu, Sri Sita Thakurani. Their son Krishna Mishra Goswami and the Advaita-vamsha dynasty.
• Sri Gadadhara Pandit. Numerous branches including that of Achyutananda, son of Advaita. Many early mahatmas of Vrindavan were disciples of Pandit Gosai.
• Sri Gopal Bhatta Goswami and Sri Srinivas Acharya. The Gosains of Radha-ramana are among the prominent followers of Gopala Bhatta. Srinivasa's influence spread across the entire eastern India.
• Sri Lokanath Goswami and Sri Narottama Das Thakur Mahashaya. Thakur Mahashaya preached far and wide across Gauda, the waves of his influence reached as far as Manipur and Assam.
• Sri Shyamananda Pandit and Sri Rasikananda Prabhu; Shyamananda was particularly influential in Orissa.
• Sri Vakreshvar Pandit and Sri Gopal Guru Goswami. Particularly influential in Orissa.

Aside the above, there are countless other lineages descending from the companions of Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Sri Nityananda Prabhu and others, often of geographically limited influence. Many such lineages have remained relatively isolated for centuries until the appearance of a prominent preacher, with whose efforts the lineage has reached across the continent.

Many of the abovementioned lineages feature so-called vaMza-paramparAs, or family dynasties, in which members of a particular branch of the family have acted in the capacity of gurus over the centuries in their respective locales. These vaMzas formed a great deal of the backbone of the early tradition in Bengal. A vaMza is not, however, a prerequisite for a paramparA as such.

There are two common usages of the word parivAra. Sometimes it is used in referring to a spiritual family traced through diksha-connections (and in the sense of "followers"), and at other times it is used as an equivalent of vaMza, or a family dynasty. The word zAkhA, a branch, is also commonly used in referring to a particular tradition. The description of the early Gaudiya tradition in the model of branches of the Chaitanya-tree is described in Chaitanya Caritamrita (Adi, ch. 10-12).

Sri Ananta Das Babaji Maharaj, when asked, would describe his lineage as "Nityananda-sakha, Dhananjaya Pandit parivar". (Dhananjaya Pandit was one of the dvAdaza-gopAlas, a disciple of Jahnava Thakurani.) Some others are in the habit of saying "Nityananda parivar" or "Jahnava parivar", though the convention appears to favor the use of "Nityananda parivar" only for lineages with a direct connection with the Nityananda-vamsha.

Most traditional Gaudiya lineages feature a distinct tilaka-svarUpa, of which they are recognized. To give a few examples, the followers of Nityananda wear a sharp, triangular neem-leaf in their tilak, the followers of Advaita a heart-shaped large banyan-leaf, and the followers of Narottama a tulasi-leaf with a small stem. The followers of Gadadhar wear a leafless tilak, and the followers of Shyamananda the imprint of Radha's anklebell with a dot in the middle.

The Gaudiya Vaishnava tradition, lacking a central authority since its very inception on account of its dynamic spread, has come to encompass a large diversity of practices and insights within the foundational framework of the Goswamis' teachings. For the most part, the distinct traditions are coming along rather well despite the plural nature of approaches. On account of such mixing, it is not uncommon to see local influences weigh on the praxis of a group of devotees just as much as the heritage of their individual branch does.

In practice, this means that a Vaisnava of Nityananda-parivara from a Bengali village and a Vaisnava of Nityananda-parivara from Radha-kunda may be like day and night, while the former may be very similar to other Vaisnavas of different parivaras around rural Bengal, and while the Kunda-vasi Nityananda-parivara Vaisnava may be very similar in his ways to the Thakur Mahasaya parivara mahatma at Govardhana.

Q&A: When someone preaches wrong conclusions, what is the proper course of action?

Q: How should one act when someone, even if a senior devotee, teaches and preaches ideas that are contrary to proper devotional conclusions? Can one correct them, should one keep their company?

A:  The proper course of action depends largely on the relationship between yourself and the person presenting the unfit instructions.

Keeping the company of someone advocating unbefitting doctrines, or persistent in his misconceptions, is a disturbance for a life of bhajan. In keeping such company, the mind will grow restless in constantly contemplating the contrary views it meets with. One should keep the company of the sadachari-sadhus who have embraced the scripture and the teachings of the purva-acharyas, who have no independent message to advocate, and who are always seeking to improve their insight and realization of siddhanta proper.

If someone is established in a relationship where he is respected in the capacity of a person of whom the contrary devotee would take advice, it is appropriate for him to attempt to rectify the situation by appealing to him with proper evidence of the correct conclusion, and with the appropriate devotional spirit of care and compassion.

If someone does not have such a relationship, he should not make unsolicited attempts to correct another. He should rather, if he truly feels that something must be done to rectify the situation, submit the matter to someone in an appropriate situation and with the power to remedy the situation. Unfit attempts to correct another are in breach of proper devotional conduct and will merely create agitation in everyone involved. If one in such a situation wishes to clarify the matter, he should present his views in the form of a question laced with proper evidences and call for a comment, rather than making a direct statement of the inappropriety of another's view.

If one is confronted with such a situation on a public arena and the matter is directly addressed to oneself, then one may, if he feels so inclined, and with due awareness of the entanglement it may create, respond in a befitting manner. Otherwise, in an assembly of Vaishnavas, if the matter is not directly addressed to oneself, or if one's response is otherwise not expected, he would do well to first allow his seniors to address the matter for the welfare of all concerned.

One should not disrespect another or delve on his faults. Contemplation on the shortcomings of others, as well as discussions featuring critique of the same, when not undertaken with a realistic and sincere spirit of offering aid for the confused party, are detrimental for devotional progress. They occupy the mind and scatter it all across the universe, they create inner tension with the medium of negative emotional responses. In the worst case scenario, if undertaken with feelings of pride, they cripple the creeper of devotion and make one revert to a situation nondifferent from the object of the critique; thus the Lord teaches us of our dependence on sadhu-kripa.

Given all the complications involved with such situations, one would do well to stay afar from contrary company and instead seek the company of those, who are endowed with a similar spirit to oneself, who are affectionate in extending their friendship, and who are farther ahead on the path of devotion. In such company, the mind will remain focused on bhajan.

Q&A: Raga-marga and family life - Do the two go together?

Q: Do raga-marga and family life go together? It seems to me that there is much emphasis on renunciation, and I can practically see, as a householder, that especially with children it is often hard to focus on wholesome sadhana.

A: This question may certainly awaken as one reflects on the long traditions of vairagi-mahatmas in Vraja, and as one then comes across sayings in the scriptures that emphasize renunciation and seem averse to family life.

In addressing this, let us first establish the foundation: The nature of bhakti. How many times has devotion been described as apratihata (unobstructed) and avyavahita (uninterrupted), and how many times has the supreme independence of devotion been glorified? Can devotion, then, be dependent on external circumstances? Has it not been said, jIvanti san-mukharitAM bhavadIya-vArtAm sthAne sthitAH (BhP 10.14.3): "Staying in your place, filling your life with narrations of the Lord heard from the saints' mouths..."

Devotion cannot, therefore, be in a subordinate position to one's external position in life: Rather, it will reign supreme in any situation of life.

One is shackled to this world by the family and the children only as long as love for Krishna has not awakened:

tAvad rAgAdayaH stenAs tAvat kArA-gRhaM gRham |
tAvan moho ’Gghri-nigaDo yAvat kRSNa na te janAH || bhp 10.14.36

"O Krishna! As long as people do not become your devotees, so long do attachments and so forth remain thieves, so long is one's home a prison cell, and so long is one shackled by illusion at the family's feet."

Visvanatha Cakravartipada offers an illuminating commentary on this verse, consisting of a lengthy response to the objection that some renunciates may present, suggesting that the residents of Vraja are but ordinary householders, bound by a network of attachment:

"Yes. That is true for most worldly householders. However, what to speak of the householders of Vraja, even your ordinary devotees in other places are superior to these renounced critics. . . .

"O Krishna! As long as people do not receive the mercy of your devotees and become your followers, they remain in this position. However, when they become your devotees, they develop attachment for bhakti and aversion to things obstructing bhakti, and then repose all their love in you. In this way, the thieves of material attraction, hatred and love become sanctified by becoming fixed in you, and then help the devotee by giving him spiritual bliss, knowledge and a host of advantages.

"In that way the same home, which was once a prison cell created by favorable and contrary karmic reactions, becomes for the devotee a place filled with service to you by hearing and chanting your glories, and by a host of other activities meant to please you. These activities carry one to your eternal abode."

Then, renouncing one's spouse and children is not a pre-requisite for following raga-marga! The stage of anisthita-bhajana (unsteady worship) at which such speculations arise is called vyUdha-vikalpA (parading possibilities) in Visvanatha Cakravarti's Madhurya-kadambini (3.10); in this section, the author goes on to present at some length the devotee's speculations on whether to renounce or to remain with the family. A very significant aspect of this section is the total absence of any conclusion on whether one ought to renounce or not – it does not seem to make any difference whatsoever to the author.

The path of bhakti is not one of acceptance and rejection; it is one of transformation. Let us remind ourselves of Rupa Gosvami's two famous verses on vairagya (BRS 1.2.255–256):

anAsaktasya viSayAn yathArham upayuJjataH |
nirbandhaH kRSNa-sambandhe yuktaM vairAgyam ucyate || 1.2.255

"Being detached from objects of enjoyment while using them in an appropriate way in relationship with Krishna is known as befitting renunciation."

The magic, then, is in forging a relationship between the world and a life of devotion, connecting the dots and making one's whole life with all it entails spiritually meaningful. On the other hand:

prApaJcikatayA buddhyA hari-sambandhi-vastunaH |
mumukSubhiH parityAgo vairAgyaM phalgu kathyate || 1.2.256

"The rejection of objects with a relationship to Hari by a seeker of mukti, who considers them worldly objects, is known as worthless renunciation."

Do not be led astray by immature renunciation, then! By doing so, you would only hamper your own devotional growth.

Narottama Das Thakur Mahasaya, a great renunciate himself, taught us the proper spirit:

gRhe vA vanete thAke, hA gaurAGga bole DAke,
narottama mAge tAra saGga ||

"Whether at home or in the forest, if one calls out, 'Ha Gauranga!' – Narottama longs for his company."

How could he have said anything less? After all, his dear companion, Srinivasa Acarya, was a father to six beautiful children: Vrindavan, Radha-Krishna, Gati-govinda, Hemalata, Krishnapriya and Kancana-latika. No less was Rasikananda, the foremost among Syamananda's disciples, who had three sons with Syamadasi – Radhananda, Krishna-Govinda and Radha-Krishna. There is no scarcity of householders with children among Mahaprabhu's companions and the following generations of illustrious Gaudiya saints and sadhakas.

In my own parampara, there is a a whole lineage of householders, and indeed over the first six generations it is specifically a vamsa, or a family lineage – and this is a trend that is present practically throughout the broad Gaudiya tradition. There is no lack of precedents in this regard.

"That's all fine in principle", says the skeptic – "But surely a householder with children can't allocate sufficient time for sadhana!"

No doubt, children will take much of one's precious time – and let us remember that time spent in raising children is also time preciously spent. One who has given his or her life to Krishna, when there is unreserved atma-samarpana – "Ha Thakur! I am yours, and yours alone!" – has effectively transformed all of life's duties from worldly to divine. This we know as Krishna's samsara – it is no longer ours.

Now, we do also need to allocate time for acts known as svarupa-siddha-bhakti, or acts that are a direct devotional engagement by their nature, such as sravana, kirtana and smarana. How do we find the time for that? We find the time by ridding ourselves of so many of our precious anarthas: Watching movies, reading worldly literature, wasting our time with countless trivial pursuits. Re-priorize your life. Whatever the quantity of time you are able to invest in direct sadhana-activities, make that time stand out. Rather than wasting three hours in half-attentive hovering about, spend half an hour or one hour in sadhana with deep focus, entirely undistracted, giving your heart and soul to it.

Visuddha-bhajana is possible anywhere, and anytime – for those willing. When amidst obstructions, our passion for bhajana grows greater and greater, and our inner force of determination is nourished; but do not think of your children as something undesired! Whatever duties Thakur has integrated into your life, take them as his gifts and tend to them as you would to your other devotional deeds.

In concluding, let us hear the apt words of Bhaktivinoda, an exemplary sadhaka and a father to ten children, from his Gitavali:

sampade vipade, bhAi, bolo hari bolo
gRhe thAko, vane thAko, bolo hari bolo
kRSNera saMsAre thAki’ bolo hari bolo

"In success and failure, O brother, chant Hari, chant!
Staying home, or staying in the forest, chant Hari, chant!
Staying in Krishna's samsara, chant Hari, chant!"

* * * * * * *

Q: Is the following verse relevant in this context?

antare niSThA kara, bAhye loka-vyavahAra |
acirAt kRSNa tomAya karibe uddhAra || CC 2.16.239

[Prabhu said:] "Maintain strong faith internally and behave
outwardly as ordinary mortals. Then very soon, Krishna will uplift you."

A: Mahaprabhu's words (CC 2.16.239), cited earlier, were spoken to Raghunatha Das in a particular situation and are out of context here. Prabhu spoke of the befitting behavior and inner attitude in a situation where the conditions are adverse. With my post, I had hoped to demonstrate that the life of a householder is not necessarily an adverse situation one must strive to be soon delivered of. The life of a householder, just as the life of a renunciate, is only as beneficial or contrary as you make it be. An escape from householder life is not an escape from worldly desires – how many times have we witnessed the temporary nature of renunciation born of adversity?

Householder life can be a great asset, if you so will. Hear Kasyapa's words to Diti from the third canto of the Bhagavata (3.14.18-21):

sarvAzramAn upAdAya svAzrameNa kalatravAn |
vyasanArNavam atyeti jala-yAnair yathArNavam || 18
yAm Ahur Atmano hy ardhaM zreyas-kAmasya mAnini |
yasyAM sva-dhuram adhyasya pumAMz carati vijvaraH || 19
yAm AzrityendriyArAtIn durjayAn itarAzramaiH |
vayaM jayema helAbhir dasyUn durga-patir yathA || 20
na vayaM prabhavas tAM tvAm anukartuM gRhezvari |
apy AyuSA vA kArtsnyena ye cAnye guNa-gRdhnavaH || 21

"With the help of all the asramas, one with a wife, in his own asrama, may cross over the perilous waves of existence just as the ocean is crossed with boats."
"O esteemed one, she is said to be a half of the man, sharing in all that is auspicious and desired; sharing his burdens, a man leads a life without distress."
"Taking shelter of her, we can easily conquer the enemies of the senses, unlike those in other asramas, just as a fort-commander drives away the invaders."
"We are unable to return the favor to you, O queen of the household, even in our entire lifetime; not even they, who appreciate such qualities, can."

Especially, if the wife and the husband are both serious sadhakas, they can do a great deal to facilitate each others' devotional lives. The burden a renunciate would have to bear alone, the two can share, taking burden off each others' shoulders and paving a smooth way for fulfilling devotional engagement.

Contrary to "classical" gender roles seen in Indian societies, the male sadhaka will never consider himself to be the master and the enjoyer of the wife's services. Rather, he is a servant just as she is. She is a maidservant of Krishna, a dasi of Radha's - and you are dasa-dasanu-das. What right do you - or I - have, then, to demand or to expect favors of others? Of course, in a naturally affectionate relationship both are seeking opportunities to help the other, to facilitate the other's immersion in bhajana - but nothing ought to be taken for granted, lest we fall into a dark well of false egoism that devours our spirit of devotion.

Now, for such a dynamic to unfold in a manner that is truly fruitful, desires for enjoying the other in a mundane way will have to be forsaken. Alas, would not the mere thought of subjecting a maidservant of Radha and Krishna to our gross, bodily desires, be audacious! With this, we shall also have to reflect on abstinence in married life. But worry not, desires can be conquered! Bhakti is a most powerful force, causing wonders in those willing to receive and embrace this divine current in their hearts!

There is no obstacle too great for the sovereign goddess of bhakti to be conquered, for she is only nourished, defeating and subjugating each and every adversary – and there is truly no rival for her power in the three worlds. Let us seek a connection that taps us to the source of this divine force, and let us be committed with sincerity in sustaining this precious link – for having attained that, the great and the inaccessible shall be within an arm's length, and no attainment in the spiritual domain shall be beyond our reach.

Q&A: Celibacy and married life: What do the acharyas teach of the need for celibacy?

Q: What are the teachings of the acharyas concerning celibacy and married life? What if one is unable to follow the highest standard, or the standard described in the scriptures?

A:  The accepted form of sexual indulgement that does runs in accordance with the principles of dharma, and hence with the practice of bhakti-sadhana, has been described as bodily union taking place for the sake of generating progeny with one's duly wedded partner. With these notes, we'll focus on reviewing the evidences in the writings of the acharyas on this often-debated matter. The practices for becoming free of sexual desire will be discussed in a separate entry.

In the first verse of his Upadeshamrita, we read Sri Rupa Goswami listing upastha-vega, or the urges of the genitals, as one of the urges that need to be conquered over. Commenting on the verse, Sri Radha-Raman Das Goswami notes, tena ca tat-tad-vega-sahanasya bhakti-pravezopayogitvam eva na tu sAdhanatvam - "By forbearing all these urges, mere entrance to bhakti is gained; it is not a sadhana-practice." Hence, in entering into the world of suddha-bhakti, the control of sexual desire is called for.

As one in his list of definitions of what a Vaishnava is, Sri Jiva Goswami cites Skanda Purana and the instructions of Markandeya to Bhagiratha:

yathA skAnde mArkaNDeya-bhagIratha-saMvAde -
dharmArthaM jIvitaM yeSAM santAnArthaM ca maithunam |
pacanaM vipramukhyArthaM jJeyAs te vaiSNavA narAH ||

atra zrI-viSNor AjJA-buddhyaiva tat tat kriyata iti vaiSNava-padena gamyate || bhs 202

"Those people for whom the purpose of life is religion, for whom the purpose of sexual intercourse are children, and for whom the purpose of cooking is to serve the brahmins, they are Vaishnavas."
Thus those, who act in awareness of the orders of Vishnu, are understood as Vaishnavas.

The essence of the thought here is that a Vaishnava would not do something that wouldn't be pleasing to Vishnu, and since sexual intercourse without a purpose beyond enjoyment isn't something that can be offered, a Vaishnava would not engage in it. Then, the Bhagavata repeats the concept in three locations, describing the suitable period for sexual union:

gRhasthasya Rtu-gAminaH || bhp 7.12.11

"The householder should have sexual intercourse only in the fertile season."

gRhasthasyApy Rtau gantuH || bhp 11.18.43

"However [though brahmacharya was described], the householder may approach his wife for intercourse in the fertile season."

evaM vyavAyaH prajayA na ratyA
imaM vizuddhaM na viduH sva-dharmam || bhp 11.5.13

"In the same way [as with other injunctions giving room for sensual indulgence], sexual intercourse should not be for the sake of lust, but for the sake of progeny. Regardless, people do not understand such pure sva-dharmas."

Thus the pure sva-dharma, or the religious duty of the householder, has been defined.

Is there a spiritual application for sexuality, can we not employ our sex desire in the service of Krishna? The famous verse of Bhagavad-gita (7.11) addresses the matter:

dharmAviruddho bhUteSu kAmo’smi bharatarSabha || bg 7.11

"I am that lust, O greatest of the Bharatas, that is not contrary to dharma."

On this passage, there are varieties of commentaries. We embrace the words of our own purva-acharyas as the ones we are to follow. The commentaries read as follows:

zrIdharaH -- dharmeNAviruddhaH sva-dAreSu putrotpAdana-mAtropayogI kAmo’ham iti ||
vizvanAthaH -- dharmAviruddhaH sva-bhAryAyAM putrotpatti-mAtropayogI ||
baladevaH -- dharmAviruddhaH svapatnyAM putrotpatti-mAtra-hetuH ||

Sridhara: "I am the lust that is not contrary to dharma and of which the sole purpose is the bestowal of progeny for one's wife."
Vishvanath: "Not contrary to dharma means in such a way that the birth of progeny from one's wife is the sole aim."
Baladeva: "Not contrary to dharma means for the sole cause of the birth of progeny from one's wife."

Hence, begetting children that are educated in the principles of good, religious life is the desired application of sex desire. Hari-bhakti-vilasa, citing Padma-purana (5.9.44-47), praises this as the equivalent of brahmacharya:

Rtu-kAlAbhigAmI yaH sva-dAra-nirataz ca yaH |
sarvadA brahmacArIha vijJeyaH sa gRhAzramI || 11.156
...
iti matvA sva-dAreSu Rtumatsu budho vrajet |
yathokta-doSa-hIneSu sakAmeSv anRtAv api || 11.173

"The householder who approaches his devoted wife for intercourse in the period suitable for fertilization is known to always be a brahmachari."
"Thus, the intelligent person will approach his wife in the fertile period. That is said to be free of faults even if done to satisfy one's desires."

Going beyond the realm of sva-dharma into the realm of sadhana, there are further considerations. In Sadhana-dipika of Radha-Krishna Das Goswami, an early mahatma of Vrindavan, specific characteristics for eligibility for rAgAnugA-bhakti are outlined:

vizeSato rAgAnugAdhikAri-lakSaNaM darzayati (brs 1.4.7) --

na patiM kAmayet kaJcid brahmacarya-sthitA sadA |
tam-eva mUrtiM dhyAyantI candrakantir-varAnanA ||

The specific characteristics of the one who is eligible for rAgAnugA are given as follows (BRS 1.4.7):

"The beautiful-faced Chandrakanti did not desire a husband and always remained fixed in celibacy, meditating on Krishna's form."

Some have objected to this passage, suggesting that the citation is out of place since it is taken from the fourth chapter of the first division of Bhakti-rasamrita-sindhu discussing the topic of prema, and that therefore brahmacharya would be for those on the stage of prema, not on the stage of sAdhana. However, Rupa Goswami presents Chandrakanti as someone who attained prema originating from bhAva due to rAgAnugA-bhakti (rAgAnugIya-bhAvottho yathA...), and the fact that she remained celibate all the time must mean she practiced brahmacharya also during the stage of sAdhana.

Radha-Krishna Das Goswami continues under the same heading:

smaraNaM kIrtanaM keliH prekSaNaM guhya-bhASaNam |
saGkalpo’dhyavasAyaz ca kriyA-nirvRtir eva ca ||
etan-maithunam aSTAGgaM pravadanti manISiNaH |
viparItaM brahmacaryam etad evASTa-lakSaNam || ity Adi || (vairAgya-martAnda 12.144-145)

"Thinking of sex, praising sex, engaging in amorous acts, looking at sex, speaking of it in confidence, making a decision to do it, to pursue it and to engage in its activities -- these are the eight aspects of copulation determined by the wise. Those engaged in brahmacharya should abstain from these eight aspects."

This brings us back to reflect on the power of sexual indulgence in its varieties forms to condition the consciousness into the confines of a material identity. Pursuit for the other-worldly identity is at the core of rAgAnugA-bhakti-sAdhana, and a sincere sAdhaka should endeavor to leave behind activities contrary to such cultivation.

All the aforenoted evidences should leave little room for interpretation over the ideal standard for a bhakti-sAdhaka. "However," someone may ask, "did the acharyas really understand our situation in this material world?" Yes, they certainly did; moreover, they had great confidence in the power of devotional practice when properly applied. Brahmacharya and other such virtues of restraint arise naturally in one who has turned his attention towards Krishna:

kRSNonmukhaM svayaM yAnti yamAH zaucAdayas tathA || brs 1.2.261

"Various restraints [among which Jiva glosses brahmacharya], purity and so forth arise of their own accord in the one who has turned his attention towards Krishna."

Hence, the virtue of celibacy will undoubtedly arise of its own accord in the one who is sincerely engaged in the practice of bhakti-sAdhana, even without separate endeavors!

Should one have lapses in his observances of the desired standard of abstinence, the following words of consolation are offered in the Bhagavata:

jAta-zraddho mat-kathAsu nirviNNaH sarva-karmasu |
veda duHkhAtmakAn kAmAn parityAge ’py anIzvaraH ||
tato bhajeta mAM prItaH zraddhAlur dRDha-nizcayaH |
juSamANaz ca tAn kAmAn duHkhodarkAMz ca garhayan || bhp 11.20.27-28

"He, whose faith for narrations of me has awakened, and who is disgusted with all works,
knowing all varieties of kAma as imbued with grief, is still unable to renounce them;
He should worship me, engaged with love, with faith and with firm conviction,
Reproaching the desires that lead to misery."

With such a meek and resolute approach, the grace of Bhagavan and Vaishnavas is quickly invoked, the obstacles on the path of devotion are swept aside, and the worshipable form of the Lord is firmly situated within the inner chambers of his heart. However, the one who philosophizes on the myriads of possible so-called spiritual applications of sexuality with a keen inclination for indulgement, will not attain para-bhakti in a hundred births without renouncing the intellect binding him to the material world. We read in the Gita:

yaH zAstra-vidhim utsRjya vartate kAma-kArataH |
na sa siddhim avApnoti na sukhaM na parAM gatim || bg 16.23

"He, who discards the precepts of the scripture, led to acts by kAma,
He will not attain siddhi, nor joy, nor the supreme destination."

Baladeva notes, sa siddhiM pumarthopAya-bhUtAM hRd-vizuddhiM naivApnoti - "He will certainly not attain that siddhi, the attainment of the means for the aims of human life, the fresh purity of the heart." Let us therefore, in all earnestness and enthusiasm, seek to embrace the desired standard of abstinence, knowing it is instrumental in attaining successive stages of devotional progress.

Q&A: Mundane music, movies and literature: Are they harmful for the practice of bhakti?

Q: Are mundane music, movies and literature harmful for the practice of bhakti? If one is attached to them, will the genre make any difference, for example documentaries vs. romance, or classical music or ragas vs. techno?

A: As a matter of general principle, mundane music, movies and literature are harmful for the development of bhakti. When assessing the devotional worth of a sense object, one must evaluate its effect on the consciousness. If a sense object does not contribute to the positive cultivation of awareness of and love for Krishna, it is contrary to devotion.

The fruit of subjecting one to mundane influences is the development of mundane desires: saGgAt saJjAyate kAmaH. Asat-sanga, or the company of the unholy, has been mentioned in countless scriptures as being contrary to devotion. Thakur Mahashaya writes in his Prema-bhakti Chandrika:

asat saGgati sadA, tyAga koro anya gItA, karmI jJAnI parihari dUre |
kevala bhakata saGga, prema-bhakti-rasa raGga, lIlA-kathA vraja-rasa-pure || pbc 15

"Always give up the company of the unholy and all other songs, stay afar from the pursuers of worldly fruits and the speculators. Keep only the company of devotees, seek delight in prema-bhakti-rasa, and engage in lila-katha in Vraja, the abode of rasa."

Were you to keep the company of the worldly or seek pleasure in their amusements, whether through direct company or vicariously enjoying through worldly movies, music and literature, you would develop attachment to the same, and in proportion your taste for Vraja-rasa would dwindle. Therefore, stay aloof!

The question is sometimes asked, "But there are some movies that contain some spiritual ideas, sometimes quite similar to our philosophy. Surely it is all right to watch them?" The inquirer must then consider this: What is the motivation in watching it? You can read the scriptures or discuss with sadhus and hear spiritual ideas that do not only resemble it, but are the real thing itself. What more could you gain from a movie made by worldly authors? How much of the input of the movie is truly of spiritual import, and how many undesired influences are introduced in the course of the movie? We are yet to hear of a mainstream movie where the balance would have been tipped in favor of positive spiritual influences in the context of our desired mode of bhajan.

Mundane music is essentially a glorification of the ways of the world. A grand deal of the time in glorifying the pleasures of life, some of the time in exploring spirituality, in introspection. Yet, of what benefit will the diverse spiritual influences be to a loving devotee who casts afar even love for the Lord of Vaikuntha? In the words of Srila Raghunath Das Goswami, in instructing his mind:

api tyaktvA lakSmI-pati-ratim ito vyoma-nayanIM
vraje rAdhA-kRSNau sva-rati-maNidau tvaM bhaja manaH || ms 4

"Also forsake love for the Consort of Lakshmi, as it'd lead you to Vaikuntha;
O Mind! Worship Radha and Krishna of Vraja, the bestowers of the jewel of their love!"

If one does has not imbibed this exclusive concept of devotion, how will the fruits of sadhana be tasted? The nectarine fruits of sadhana are available for the relish of those engaged in exclusive worship, casting afar both the mundane and the contrary spiritual tastes.

Are there gradations of difference between different modes of entertainment? Yes, certainly, inasmuch as all phenomena of the world are appearances of the three modes of nature. Pursuits for enjoyment and material progress are superior to madness and ignorance, and search for knowledge supersedes pursuits for enjoyement. Yet, they are all shackles binding us to the temporary world. In Sri Krishna's words to Arjuna:

trai-guNya-viSayA vedA nistrai-guNyo bhavArjuna |
nirdvandvo nitya-sattva-stho niryoga-kSema AtmavAn || bg 2.45

"The Vedas deal with the enjoyments of the three modes; free yourself of the three modes, O Arjuna! Rise and be established in the eternal reality beyond duality, free from concerns of sustenance, established in the self!"

If this is true of the ancient literature of the sages, then how much more is this true of contemporary mundane literature! The question may again arise, "But surely the study of such literature may be undertaken as a matter of acquainting oneself with the ways of the world, to be able to present the path of devotion in a meaningful manner?" Thus speaks the preacher. The Bhagavata says:

veda-vAda-rato na syAn na pASaNDI na haitukaH |
zuSka-vAda-vivAde na kaJcit pakSaM samAzrayet || bhAg 11.18.30

"Do not devote yourself to the rituals of the Vedas, do not engage in arguments over fruitless topics with atheists and logicians, never take sides on such topics."

Sri Jiva Goswami comments on the words pASaNDI na syAd, iti pUrva-pakSa-jJAnArtham api pASaNDa-mataM nAbhyased ityarthaH - "Do not study the opinions of the atheists for the sake of gaining knowledge of counter-argumentation." Since mundane knowledge is not conclusive, but is ever-changing by its nature, there is no end in sight to entangling engagements in the realm of mundane knowledge.

The path of devotion stands on its own merit, it calls for no contextualization to exercise its effect. The message of devotion has a deep impact on the heart of the hearer when originating from a pure source, from a loving and spotless heart. The hearer, witnessing the other-worldly qualities of the speaker, will take a keen interest in the message without regard for the context it appears in. Whatever cultural or topical contextualization may be there, it must remain subservient to the effect of the devotee's own practice and absorption. One should keep his focus on cultivating the heart.

There are useful spheres of knowledge in the mundane realm; the classical arts of music, poetry and so forth are all worthy of being engaged as a matter of seva, of loving service. These classical arts are present both in this world and the world of divine play. Studying them with the aim of engaging them for the pleasure of Radha and Krishna is a worthy undertaking indeed, as long as the study is kept in the proper perspective. Familiarity with languages such as Bengali and Sanskrit opens new doors of devotional insight in the form of direct access to the countless works of divine inspiration in our vast canon of literature, and it bestows the ability to interact with sadhus in their native language.

Additionally, if there are fields of knowledge that must be pursued as a matter of fulfilling one's occupational duties and maintaining one's livelihood, and if such pursuits are undertaken in a spirit of detachment, they will not have an adverse effect on devotional cultivation, though they may certainly be a distracting and time-consuming factor. As long as one lives in this world in a situation short of full withdrawal from the world, a degree of awareness and information of the ways of the world is called for. Yet, one must always exercise caution and re-evaluate the nature of the situation and of one's heart's feeling in relation to the said undertakings.

The nature of the mind is to seek variety, to seek novelties; the nature of the senses is to be drawn to sense objects. In absence of spiritual counterparts, the two are naturally drawn towards mundane objects. One should, therefore, always seek to place himself in a position surrounded by divine objects and divine company. It is with this great need in mind that we are constantly striving to produce varieties of devotional media, facilitating different avenues of devotional interaction. It is our sincere prayer that the devotees scattered across the globe, often in isolation and amidst unfavorable influences, take full advantage of what is being offered.

Q&A: Leaving a non-Vaishnava guru

Q: Should one leave a non-Vaishnava guru? What is the best procedure for doing it?

A: The Vaishnava-shastras advice us to give up the mantra given by a guru who is a non-Vaishnava, seeking shelter of a Vaishnava-guru:

avaiSNavopadiSTena mantreNa nirayaM vrajet |
punaz ca vidhinA samyag grAhayed vaiSNavAd guroH || hbv 4.366

"From the mantra instructed by a non-Vaishnava, only grief will arise.
One should again accept a guru in accordance with injunctions, a Vaishnava-guru."

Padma-purana (6.226.1) has a similar shloka, stating avaiSNavopadiSTena mantreNa na parA gatiH - "The mantra instructed by a non-Vaishnava will not deliver the highest aim." One who has been captivated with the ideals of Vaishnavism should therefore adopt the path leading him to the desired destination, forsaking paths and allegiances that prove to be obstructions to the same.

The essence of the advice is to ensure that one becomes firmly established on the path leading onwards to the desired goal. To the best of my knowledge, our acharyas have not written specific instructions concerning the manner in which the former allegiances are to be closed. The reason being, there are countless non-Vaishnava traditions with distinct practices and cultures, and amidst them countless individual situations may arise.

A Vaishnava, by his nature, is not inclined to cause unnecessary grief to others. Sadness caused in the minds of others is a burden for the soul. Therefore, in situations such as this, if there are multiple avenues that'll essentially accomplish the same goal, ie. wholehearted adoption of the path proper towards the desired goal, one should take the course of action that is least likely to give grief to others. What exactly this is in the situation you describe, you'll have to assess yourself as you are yourself best aware of the situation and the individuals involved. Let us reflect on the general principles involved.

If you do choose to address the issue in person, do remember to observe the appropriate etiquette of respect towards a senior person you once revered in the capacity of a guru. In a meek state of mind, express your heart's burning desire and determination to follow your chosen path, note how the ways of Bhagavan are unforeseen, express your gratutide for all that has taken place and been given, and ask for his blessings to move onwards in your quest for paramartha. If the unfortunate situation should arise where the former guru's anger is displayed, never respond with anger, but always display the ideal character of a true Vaishnava.

If you suspect that a conflict situation would arise in a personal exchange, consider writing a letter as a matter of courtesy. I would personally opt for informing the guru via whatever medium is convenient instead of moving on "in secret". I am certain the former gurus would expect that you informed them of the change of situation. He has once accepted responsibility for overseeing your spiritual progress, why should you keep him under the impression that he must still bear the burden of responsibility? This is a common courtesy observed even in mere mundane dealings. You would not leave a job without informing your boss of the same, would you?

If the issue of your having accepted a new guru and a new path came to the former guru's attention without your having informed him, how would he think of Vaishnavas then? In contrast, if you had informed him of the change of situation in a manner befitting the good character of a Vaishnava, how would he think of Vaishnavas then, and how would he speak of Vaishnavas then? You would then bear the responsibility for that. Remember to consider the possible ramifications of your move beyond the immediate personal interests. The seemingly easiest way may not always be the best way in the grand scheme of spiritual life.

Q&A: Devotion and renunciation: The role of vairagya in cultivating bhakti

The following are a series of questions and answers I compiled during 2005-2006, originally posted at Vilasa Kunja forums.

Q: What is the relationship between renunciation and bhakti in Gaudiya Vaishnavism? On one hand, it is said that renunciation is not a cause of devotion and that excessive renunciation makes the heart hard, and on the other hand we can read of how the Goswamis of Vraja were very renounced, and how Mahaprabhu was pleased with their renunciation.

A: It is known that renunciation is not a method for developing devotion, bhaktyA saJjAtayA bhaktyA (bhp 11.3.31) – “Devotion is born of devotion.” Regardless, following all the activities that have been prescribed for the path of sadhana calls for substantial sacrifice of comfort and renunciation from the mundane. How is this reconciled, what is the relationship between bhakti and vairagya?

Renunciation involved in devotional cultivation is of a nature different from worldly vairagya: One of the first aspects of devotion one is to embrace is kRSNArthe bhogAdi-tyAga (brs 1.2.104), forsaking enjoyments and the rest for Krishna’s sake. This is the spirit of zaraNAgati, surrender: AnukUlyasya saGkalpaH pratikUlya-vivarjanam (hbv 11.676) – “Firmly embracing the favorable, shunning all that is contrary.” Whenever a decision is called for, one should forsake one’s own interest and act in the interest of Krishna.

What, then, is the advantage of such renunciation? In the words of Sri Kapiladeva:

jJAna-vairAgya-yuktena bhakti-yuktena cAtmanA |
paripazyaty udAsInaM prakRtiM ca hataujasam || bhp 3.25.18

“Equipped with knowledge and renunication, as the atma is connected in devotion, one observes with indifference and the power of prakriti is destroyed.”

Therefore, in the opening verse of Sri Upadesamrita, Srila Rupa Goswami calls for the practicing devotees to become dhIra, self-controlled, rising above the worldly urges that perpetually distract us from bhajana. Radha Ramana Goswami notes that one attains the desired goal by vega-sahanopayogena saMvRddhayA bhaktyA, “Devotion that has been fortified by the means of self-control.”

In discussing the sadhaka’s unavoidable relationship to a world of sense-objects, Srila Rupa Goswami has described two approaches to renunciation (BRS 1.2.255-256):

anAsaktasya viSayAn yathArham upayuJjataH |
nirbandhaH kRSNa-sambandhe yuktaM vairAgyam ucyate ||
prApaJcikatayA buddhyA hari-sambandhi-vastunaH |
mumukSubhiH parityAgo vairAgyaM phalgu kathyate ||

“Detached from sense-objects, applying them according to their due merit, engaging them in connection with Krishna; This is called befitting renunciation.”
“Considering as worldly the items connected with Hari, the one desirous of salvation rejects them; this is called worthless renunciation.”

In this matter, one should proceed with great caution and assess his motivations in employing sense-objects. The fact that something could be employed in connection with Krishna does not necessarily mean that it should be thus employed. One must therefore determine whether such employment would run in the spirit of AnukUlyasya saGkalpaH, accepting the favorable, for this is the spirit of uttama-bhakti: AnukUlyena kRSNAnu-zIlanaM bhaktir uttamA (BRS 1.1.11). Such engagement must be devoid of selfish motivations, anyAbhilASitA-zUnya.

From where does devotional renunciation arise, then? It arises from anurAga, from a deep passion burning within the heart of the sadhaka that calls him to take any and all measures needed for the sake of fulfilling his devotional aspirations. Srila Raghunath Das Goswami, our foremost role-model in this matter, described this mode of practice as vairAgya-yug-bhakti-rasa-prayatna (vk 6), “Efforts enlaced with renunciation and bhakti-rasa.” Describing his ways of devotional practice, Krishnadas Kaviraja writes (CC 1.10.98-102):

anna-jala tyAga kaila anya-kathana |
pala dui-tina mAThA karena bhakSaNa ||
sahasra daNDavat kare, laya lakSa nAma |
dui sahasra vaiSNavere nitya paraNAma ||
rAtri-dine rAdhA-kRSNera mAnasa sevana |
prahareka mahAprabhura caritra-kathana ||
sArdha sapta-prahara kare bhaktira sAdhane |
cAri daNDa nidrA, seha nahe kona-dine ||
tAGhAra sAdhana-rIti zunite camatkAra |
sei rUpa-raghunAtha prabhu ye AmAra ||

“Rejecting eating and drinking, as well as talks on other topics, he took but a few drops of buttermilk. A thousand dandavats he offered, and chanted a lakh of names; Daily, he bowed to two thousand Vaishnavas. Day and night, he served Radha and Krishna in his mind, and discussed Mahaprabhu’s pastimes for one prahar. For seven and half praharas, he engaged in bhakti-sadhana, sleeping for four dandas, and at times not even that. Hearing of the ways of his sadhana, one is astonished; these two, Rupa and Raghunath, are my masters.”

Through such passion for bhajana, and the absolute rejection of the mundane it entails, Sriman Mahaprabhu is pleased:

mahAprabhura bhakta-gaNera vairAgya pradhAna |
yAhA dekhi’ prIta hana gaura-bhagavAn || cc 3.6.220

“Among Mahaprabhu’s devotees, vairagya prevails;
Seeing it, Gaura Bhagavan becomes satisfied.”

Seeing the exemplary renunciation in the character of Raghunath Das, Mahaprabhu’s joy knew no bounds. May all the sadhakas following Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu seek to embrace such a spirit of devotional renunciation!