Commenting on
sarvAm apImAM pRthivIM sa ziSyAt, the commentator notes:
sarvA pRthvIM ziSyAditi vAg-Adi-vega-sahanopayogena
saMvRddhayA bhaktyA sarvapAvanatvAt |
"With 'instructing the whole world' and so on, it is said that the quality of being able to deliver all is there, when devotion thrives through the means of controlling urges headed by speech."
He then cites a verse that illustrates vividly the nature of the devotee, who has controlled the urges and is deep in his devotional feeling.
vAg gadgadA dravate yasya cittaM
rudaty abhIkSNaM hasati kvacic ca |
vilajja udgAyati nRtyate ca
mad-bhakti-yukto bhuvanaM punAti || bhp 11.14.24
"He whose voice is choking, whose consciousness melts;
Who cries again and again, and at times laughs, too;
Without shame, he sings loudly and dances as well,
Endowed with devotion for me, he purifies the world."
One does not, then, attain the quality of being able to deliver one and all merely on the merit of self-control. Rather, this self-control provides a platform on which devotion can flourish, and through that, the quality of
sarva-pAvanatva is attained.
- The first verse says that one who can control the six urges can "instruct the whole world". You mentioned that this is a poeticism of Srila Rupa Goswami, which can otherwise be understood to mean that one who has renounced the six urges gains tremendous power with which to perform bhajan. Where does the concept come from?
This understanding is drawn from the following statement of Radha Raman Goswami's:
sarvA pRthvIM ziSyAditi vAg-Adi-vega-sahanopayogena saMvRddhayA bhaktyA sarvapAvanatvAt | - "With the statement 'The whole world as disciple' and so forth, it is said that the quality of
sarva-pAvanatva, being able to deliver all, comes when devotion is fortified by the means of controlling the urges headed by speech." The word
saMvRddha means "increased", "thriving", "prospering" and so forth, by the
upayoga or "application" of
vega-sahana, "controlling the urges".
The GVS edition of Upadeshamrita, unfortunately, is not a very accurate representation of Radha Raman Goswami's original tika. It elaborates unnecessarily, it misses important nuances. It is, regardless, helpful for reference.
Aside the above
pramana, this is a natural and logical understanding. When one is no longer distracted by other things, his bhakti gains a power of focus. Moreover, the giving up of the unworthy for the sake of the Lord invokes his mercy, which is what the power of all devotional practice is made of.
- Also, can you understand this verse to have two meanings? First, as you've discussed, as a list of prerequisites for entrance into powerful bhajan and second, as a list of qualities an aspirant should look for in selecting a Guru?
Yes, these are certainly two possible readings of the verse. They are not really two separate meanings as such; each individual who gains the quality of
sarva-pAvanatva, a quality appearing when devotion is fortified with self-control, is a de facto guru on the virtue of his spiritual accomplishment, regardless of whether he "officially" acts in such a capacity. As in Devakinandana Dasa's famous Vaishnava Vandana,
mahAprabhura gaNa saba patita pAvana, "All the devotees of Mahaprabhu are the saviors of the fallen," and
brahmANDa tArite zakti dhare jane jane, "Each and every one of them carries the power to deliver the universe."
- If the second reading is also valid, and part of what Rupa Goswami wants to instruct, how essential is it that one select a Guru with such qualities? Are other qualifications, such as knowledge and realization of sastra (as per SB 11.3.21) not more important? Are the two inseperably connected? It seems as though one can be very admirably renounced without being strongly fixed in the devotional conclusions of our line.
The aspect of
brahmaNy upazamAzrayam of the abovementioned verse corresponds best with the themes of this verse; having given up all material pursuits and surrendered to the Lord, the devotee has rejected all pursuits for sense-objects, knowing them to be contrary to devotion.
Knowledge, in the sense of knowledge of the content of the scriptures, and realization, in the sense of yukti or logic in understanding and cross-referencing scriptures, amounts to
paNDitya, scolarship. Therefore it is said that the guru is
zabde pare ca niSNAtam, "deeply familiar with the scriptures and the supreme": His knowledge and his practice has born the fruit of personal encounters with the Lord, a deep, vivid relationship of loving interaction has been forged. If the knowledge of the scripture, no matter how eloquently presented, is not accompanied with realization in the sense of all that
brahmaNy upazamAzrayam implies, the "qualification" is but an empty shell.
This eloquent, empty shell is often mistaken for a sign of great advancement. I have seen this even in my own case, hearing people say that "you must be very advanced to write like this", while I am painfully aware that I am not very advanced, and at the time of hearing such statements even my daily devotional routine wasn't very exemplary. I'm sure we can also think of some other examples, even from the recent history of our samaj, of people writing the most eloquent of philosophies and rasa-laden presentations, while their practice and heart's condition was something rather different.
Therefore, do not be fooled by words alone. Spend time with the guru, observe his behavior. The rule of Hari-bhakti-vilasa is that the guru and the disciple should spend a year together, examining each other, before diksha is to take place. Hardly anyone pays attention to this. Yet, the disciple should, for his own welfare, ensure that the guru truly practices what he preaches, and thereby possesses the potency to truly infuse the divine truths into your heart. If this potency is not there, the heart of the disciple will not be transformed in the desired manner.
