UP 3: Jihva-udara-vega and foods of bad nature, The urges of the tongue and the belly

NB. the views on the specifics of dietary restrictions in this post do not reflect the position of mainstream Gaudiya Vaishnavism, but rather a subsection among the babaji-ascetics I was familiar with. It does, however, for the most part derive from Puranas and dharma-shastras.


Jihva-vega and udara-vega, or the urges of the tongue and the urges of the belly, go largely hand in hand. The tongue is affected by the lower modes of nature, and therefore seeks to always eat items reflecting its character. The zAstra-kAras have, however, for our upliftment, given dietary recommendations, advising us to avoid foods tainted by ignorance and passion to uplift our consciousness.

Such recommendations have been issued in works such as Hari-bhakti-vilasa and the sattvika-puranas headed by Varaha, Vishnu, Padma and the rest. Some common items that are tainted with the lower modes of nature and hence to be avoided are onion, garlic, eggplant, carrots, cabbages, cauliflower, red lentils, radish, buffalo milk and products thereof, tomatos, beetroot, hing and others sharing a similar nature. Additionally, excessive use of oil, spices or heat-generating products taints the food with the mode of passion.

The general principles concerning foods in the three modes of nature are outlined in the Gita as follows:

AyuH-sattva-balArogya-sukha-prIti-vivardhanAH |
rasyAH snigdhAH sthirA hRdyA AhArAH sAttvika-priyAH || bg 17.8

"Foods that increase life-span, perseverance, strength, health, joy and satisfaction, that are juicy, fatty, solid and pleasing to the heart are dear to those in the mode of sattva."

kaTv-amla-lavaNAty-uSNa-tIkSNa-rUkSa-vidAhinaH |
AhArA rAjasasyeSTA duHkha-zokAmaya-pradAH || bg 17.9

"Foods that are too bitter, sour, salty, hot, astringent or burning are dear to those in the mode of passion, and are causes of sorrow, lamentation and disease."

yAta-yAmaM gata-rasaM pUti paryuSitaM ca yat |
ucchiSTam api cAmedhyaM bhojanaM tAmasa-priyam || bg 17.10

"Food that is old, tasteless, of bad odor, decomposed, left over by others or untouchable, is dear to those in the mode of ignorance."

One who wishes to lead a life of bhajan should always cultivate the mode of sattva, from which follows peace of mind, focus and so forth, qualities instrumental in becoming absorbed in devotional practice.

- Doesn't renunciation automatically follow bhakti? Why is there any need for separate endeavor?

While it is certainly true that bhakti makes one disinterested in material pleasures, one anga of bhakti, one among the ten first that are specially emphasized in the beginning to be precise, is kRSNarthe bhogAdi-tyAga, "Giving up enjoyments and so forth for the sake of Krishna." When the varieties of urges prove to be a distraction for bhakti, they must be immediately forsaken; if one does not do that, he acts against the spirit of surrender, anukUlyasya saGkalpaH, pratikUlya-vivarjanam.

I am positive you were not suggesting that one can freely indulge the senses while believing that bhakti will eventually free one from the such. Yet, such ideas are sometimes heard, and they deserve a mention.

- How to attain sattva-guna, and why is it important?

I was reading Sri Ananta Das Babaji's Rasa Darshan the other day. Early on in the text, he discusses the need for the presence of sattva-guna and the withdrawal of rajas and tamas as a prerequisite of being able to taste rasa; even the rasa present in mundane drama!

I am copying the relevant passage below. I apologize for possible mistakes in the Sanskrit, I don't have the original work at hand, and the English edition is a bit erratic with diacritics. I have revised the translations.

The question may arise, "How can we acquire sattva-guna?" One may then reply that by eating sattvika food, wearing sattvika clothes, living in a sattvika environment and by keeping the company of sattvika people, one's sattva-guna will be nourished.

zaucAt sattva-zuddhi saumanaH ekAgrendriya jayatAm Atma-darzanam yogyatAni ||

"Through zauca, pure habits, existence is purified, the mind becomes satisfied, the senses are conquered and one becomes qualified for perceiving the self."

The Upanishad says:

AhAra-zuddhau sattva-zuddhiH sattva-zuddhau dhruvA smRtiH smRti-labdhe sarva-granthInAM vipramokSaH ||

"Through pure eating, existence is purified. With the purification of existence, meditation becomes constant. With the attainment of meditation, all knots of bondage loosen."

- By which mode are buffalo milk and urad dal tainted?

Both are tainted by both passion and ignorance. Buffalo milk is specifically tainted by the rajas that sometimes arises in buffalos, a familiar sight for everyone living among them I'm certain. Urad dal is primarily in the mode of ignorance.

- What for those who can't get sattvic foodstuffs? Don't they have any scope for doing ideal bhajan? Is he exempted from the effect?

It is hard to imagine a situation where sattvic foodstuffs would absolutely not be available. Fruits are everywhere. Potato, cucumber, zucchini and so forth are widely available. Rice and varieties of other grains are everywhere.

Can someone be exempted from the effect of eating items tainted with the modes of passion and ignorance? Can someone's body be exempted from the effects of heat and the eventual sun-stroke if no shadow is in sight? The body is a machine, the mind is a machine. They behave in accordance with the fuel fed to them.

- If somebody has to eat foods in mode of passion but if he is feeling absolutely no attraction to that foodstuff, then what about him? Can he save himself from the effect?

That does not save him from being effected, though the inner spirit described will certainly serve to cut off its worst edge. It will eventually lead him to a situation where he can eat only sattvik foodstuffs, no doubt.

- How much time (and amount) does it take for the mode of a particular foodstuff to act? Maybe this varies from person to person but on what all factors does this depend?

The effects are instant. However, someone covered over by tamas and rajas, being accustomed to the presence of the two since his birth, may not be able to observe the difference. Therefore, I have suggested that an experiment first be preceded with an endeavor to bring oneself to sattva.

The more regular the consumption is, the deeper one sinks into the modes. An accidental, one-time consumption is easily nullified with the power of bhajan. However, one should remember: nAmno balAd yasya hi pApa-buddhir, na vidyate tasya yamair hi zuddhiH - "For the one, who thinks he can sin on the strength of the Name, it is unknown what may be done be redeemed in the eyes if Yama."

Therefore, if one ends up in a situation where an unwanted activity is committed, or has been committed, to avoid this nama-aparadha, one should rather think, "Alas, let this wretch get everything he deserves!"